Penny-stock additions require transaction-specific evidence; general investigation material alone cannot establish undisclosed income or accommodation...
Transfer pricing comparability prioritises reliable external CUPs and foreign-currency LIBOR benchmarks for exports, borrowings and delayed receivable...
Section 153C satisfaction and seized electronic records sustained unexplained-investment addition, subject to proportionate ownership-share verificati...
The HC held that the AO lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment beyond four years u/s 147. The reasons did not establish the assessee's failure to fully disclose material facts. The AO merely changed its opinion on the same material, which is impermissible. Reopening was based on existing material without any fresh tangible evidence, violating the first proviso to Section 147. The HC entertained the writ petition and quashed the reopening notice for lack of jurisdictional compliance.
The HC held that the AO lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment beyond four years u/s 147. The reasons did not establish the assessee's failure to fully disclose material facts. The AO merely changed its opinion on the same material, which is impermissible. Reopening was based on existing material without any fresh tangible evidence, violating the first proviso to Section 147. The HC entertained the writ petition and quashed the reopening notice for lack of jurisdictional compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.