Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition on the ground that efficacious alternative statutory remedies of appeal were available to the petitioner. Freezing of the petitioner's bank account did not violate principles of natural justice as it would not affect the petitioner's ability to institute an appeal by making the pre-deposit. The HC relied on precedents like Oberoi Constructions Ltd and Greatship (India) Limited, which emphasized exhaustion of statutory appellate remedies before entertaining writ petitions, especially in cases involving factual inquiries or classification disputes. The HC noted the tendency to bypass statutory remedies and held that general averments cannot justify bypassing such remedies. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was relegated to the alternative remedy of appeal before the Appellate Authority.
The HC dismissed the petition on the ground that efficacious alternative statutory remedies of appeal were available to the petitioner. Freezing of the petitioner's bank account did not violate principles of natural justice as it would not affect the petitioner's ability to institute an appeal by making the pre-deposit. The HC relied on precedents like Oberoi Constructions Ltd and Greatship (India) Limited, which emphasized exhaustion of statutory appellate remedies before entertaining writ petitions, especially in cases involving factual inquiries or classification disputes. The HC noted the tendency to bypass statutory remedies and held that general averments cannot justify bypassing such remedies. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was relegated to the alternative remedy of appeal before the Appellate Authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.