Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
The HC quashed the order raising demand for IGST on goods cleared from SEZ to DTA. The petitioner was not required to pay IGST on such supply as it is treated as import for DTA unit which is liable to pay IGST and duties. The respondent failed to consider provisions of Section 74 requiring adjudication of show cause notice by considering reply and provisions of the Act. The attempt to justify the order based on Sections 37 and 39 was unacceptable. The impugned order lacked reasoning and was quashed.
The HC quashed the order raising demand for IGST on goods cleared from SEZ to DTA. The petitioner was not required to pay IGST on such supply as it is treated as import for DTA unit which is liable to pay IGST and duties. The respondent failed to consider provisions of Section 74 requiring adjudication of show cause notice by considering reply and provisions of the Act. The attempt to justify the order based on Sections 37 and 39 was unacceptable. The impugned order lacked reasoning and was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
