Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The HC quashed the order raising demand for IGST on goods cleared from SEZ to DTA. The petitioner was not required to pay IGST on such supply as it is treated as import for DTA unit which is liable to pay IGST and duties. The respondent failed to consider provisions of Section 74 requiring adjudication of show cause notice by considering reply and provisions of the Act. The attempt to justify the order based on Sections 37 and 39 was unacceptable. The impugned order lacked reasoning and was quashed.
The HC quashed the order raising demand for IGST on goods cleared from SEZ to DTA. The petitioner was not required to pay IGST on such supply as it is treated as import for DTA unit which is liable to pay IGST and duties. The respondent failed to consider provisions of Section 74 requiring adjudication of show cause notice by considering reply and provisions of the Act. The attempt to justify the order based on Sections 37 and 39 was unacceptable. The impugned order lacked reasoning and was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.