Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3381 to 3400 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed the order raising demand for IGST on goods cleared from SEZ to DTA. The petitioner was not required to pay IGST on such supply as it is treated as import for DTA unit which is liable to pay IGST and duties. The respondent failed to consider provisions of Section 74 requiring adjudication of show cause notice by considering reply and provisions of the Act. The attempt to justify the order based on Sections 37 and 39 was unacceptable. The impugned order lacked reasoning and was quashed.
The HC quashed the order raising demand for IGST on goods cleared from SEZ to DTA. The petitioner was not required to pay IGST on such supply as it is treated as import for DTA unit which is liable to pay IGST and duties. The respondent failed to consider provisions of Section 74 requiring adjudication of show cause notice by considering reply and provisions of the Act. The attempt to justify the order based on Sections 37 and 39 was unacceptable. The impugned order lacked reasoning and was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
