Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The SC upheld the Delhi HC decision in Intercontinental Consultants & Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI, holding that reimbursable expenses incurred by the petitioner for providing taxable services under the Finance Act would form part of the valuation of taxable services for charging service tax only from 14.05.2015 by virtue of Section 67. Prior to this, such expenses could not be included. Consequently, the demand confirmed in the impugned order for the period before 14.05.2015 was quashed. The petition was allowed.
The SC upheld the Delhi HC decision in Intercontinental Consultants & Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI, holding that reimbursable expenses incurred by the petitioner for providing taxable services under the Finance Act would form part of the valuation of taxable services for charging service tax only from 14.05.2015 by virtue of Section 67. Prior to this, such expenses could not be included. Consequently, the demand confirmed in the impugned order for the period before 14.05.2015 was quashed. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.