Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Approved resolution plans extinguish unsubmitted pre-approval tax claims, preventing later recovery outside the insolvency process and preserving a cl...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
681 to 700 of 95798 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The SC upheld the Delhi HC decision in Intercontinental Consultants & Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI, holding that reimbursable expenses incurred by the petitioner for providing taxable services under the Finance Act would form part of the valuation of taxable services for charging service tax only from 14.05.2015 by virtue of Section 67. Prior to this, such expenses could not be included. Consequently, the demand confirmed in the impugned order for the period before 14.05.2015 was quashed. The petition was allowed.
The SC upheld the Delhi HC decision in Intercontinental Consultants & Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI, holding that reimbursable expenses incurred by the petitioner for providing taxable services under the Finance Act would form part of the valuation of taxable services for charging service tax only from 14.05.2015 by virtue of Section 67. Prior to this, such expenses could not be included. Consequently, the demand confirmed in the impugned order for the period before 14.05.2015 was quashed. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.