Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT held that after approval of a resolution plan by the Adjudicating Authority, it becomes binding on the corporate debtor, employees, creditors, guarantors and stakeholders. The plan cannot be modified by introducing new claims, as it would prejudice the successful resolution applicant (SRA) and create uncertainty. The Adjudicating Authority lacks power to modify an approved plan unilaterally and can only suggest modifications to the Committee of Creditors (CoC). As the respondent did not challenge the plan within the prescribed time, it attained finality. The SRA made payments per the approved plan, and no non-compliance was attributed to it. Thus, the Adjudicating Authority exceeded jurisdiction by reviving and directing payment of the respondent's gratuity claims, and the NCLAT set aside those orders.
The NCLAT held that after approval of a resolution plan by the Adjudicating Authority, it becomes binding on the corporate debtor, employees, creditors, guarantors and stakeholders. The plan cannot be modified by introducing new claims, as it would prejudice the successful resolution applicant (SRA) and create uncertainty. The Adjudicating Authority lacks power to modify an approved plan unilaterally and can only suggest modifications to the Committee of Creditors (CoC). As the respondent did not challenge the plan within the prescribed time, it attained finality. The SRA made payments per the approved plan, and no non-compliance was attributed to it. Thus, the Adjudicating Authority exceeded jurisdiction by reviving and directing payment of the respondent's gratuity claims, and the NCLAT set aside those orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.