Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
The HC held that the impugned order u/s 129 of the Odisha GST Act, 2017 was not timely. Despite the petitioner's appeal mentioning 27.09.2024 as the order date, the HC found the order was made on the 8th day from the notice specifying penalty, violating Section 129(3). Consequently, the order was set aside and quashed, and the petition was disposed of.
The HC held that the impugned order u/s 129 of the Odisha GST Act, 2017 was not timely. Despite the petitioner's appeal mentioning 27.09.2024 as the order date, the HC found the order was made on the 8th day from the notice specifying penalty, violating Section 129(3). Consequently, the order was set aside and quashed, and the petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.