Electricity network contributions remain revenue expenditure where ownership and maintenance stay with the electricity board, supporting business prof...
HC quashed the order and restored the adjudication of show cause notice to the respondent authority. Petitioner is entitled to relief. Adjudicating authority's findings on ownership of goods were contradictory. It failed to properly consider the effect of notification treating amounts obtained through KIIFB as grant from government. Respondent directed to pass fresh order after hearing petitioner, considering whether absence of consideration precludes 'supply' u/s 7 of CGST Act, and whether KIIFB amounts should be treated as government grant under the notification.
HC quashed the order and restored the adjudication of show cause notice to the respondent authority. Petitioner is entitled to relief. Adjudicating authority's findings on ownership of goods were contradictory. It failed to properly consider the effect of notification treating amounts obtained through KIIFB as grant from government. Respondent directed to pass fresh order after hearing petitioner, considering whether absence of consideration precludes 'supply' u/s 7 of CGST Act, and whether KIIFB amounts should be treated as government grant under the notification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
