Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC quashed the order and restored the adjudication of show cause notice to the respondent authority. Petitioner is entitled to relief. Adjudicating authority's findings on ownership of goods were contradictory. It failed to properly consider the effect of notification treating amounts obtained through KIIFB as grant from government. Respondent directed to pass fresh order after hearing petitioner, considering whether absence of consideration precludes 'supply' u/s 7 of CGST Act, and whether KIIFB amounts should be treated as government grant under the notification.
HC quashed the order and restored the adjudication of show cause notice to the respondent authority. Petitioner is entitled to relief. Adjudicating authority's findings on ownership of goods were contradictory. It failed to properly consider the effect of notification treating amounts obtained through KIIFB as grant from government. Respondent directed to pass fresh order after hearing petitioner, considering whether absence of consideration precludes 'supply' u/s 7 of CGST Act, and whether KIIFB amounts should be treated as government grant under the notification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
