Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Petitioner challenged validity of re-assessment u/s 148A. HC quashed impugned order and notice initiating re-assessment proceedings issued by 3rd Respondent. HC held short time of two days given to petitioner to reply after receiving Investigation Report violated principles of natural justice. Order passed in undue haste smacking arbitrariness, not following statutory provision of Section 148A. When new facts introduced in notice on 20.03.2024, at least seven days' time should have been granted to petitioner to reply, but proceedings conducted hurriedly violating natural justice.
Petitioner challenged validity of re-assessment u/s 148A. HC quashed impugned order and notice initiating re-assessment proceedings issued by 3rd Respondent. HC held short time of two days given to petitioner to reply after receiving Investigation Report violated principles of natural justice. Order passed in undue haste smacking arbitrariness, not following statutory provision of Section 148A. When new facts introduced in notice on 20.03.2024, at least seven days' time should have been granted to petitioner to reply, but proceedings conducted hurriedly violating natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
