Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the assessee organisation cannot be granted exemption u/s 11 for the preceding assessment year 2012-13 as the registration u/s 12A was obtained in 2019, after the assessment was completed, and the relevant proviso stood omitted from 01.04.2023. The expenditure incurred on infrastructure creation is capital in nature, while maintenance and administration expenses are revenue expenses. The assessee is entitled to claim depreciation on infrastructure assets. The notional interest expenditure booked by treating the government grant as a loan is not allowable. The grant should be treated as income, and the assessee can claim depreciation on assets. The assessee was given an opportunity to rectify its accounts. The revenue's appeal was partly allowed.
The ITAT held that the assessee organisation cannot be granted exemption u/s 11 for the preceding assessment year 2012-13 as the registration u/s 12A was obtained in 2019, after the assessment was completed, and the relevant proviso stood omitted from 01.04.2023. The expenditure incurred on infrastructure creation is capital in nature, while maintenance and administration expenses are revenue expenses. The assessee is entitled to claim depreciation on infrastructure assets. The notional interest expenditure booked by treating the government grant as a loan is not allowable. The grant should be treated as income, and the assessee can claim depreciation on assets. The assessee was given an opportunity to rectify its accounts. The revenue's appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.