Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
AO reopened assessment beyond 4 year period without establishing assessee failed to truly disclose material facts. ITAT quashed reopening, holding AO merely changed opinion without tangible belief of escaped income. PCIT's revision u/s 263 to assess other income was rejected as show-cause didn't specify impugned order date, making action time-barred. Further, PCIT couldn't conclude assessment erroneous for non-consideration of information already possessed by AO while forming reopening belief. Assessee's appeal allowed by ITAT.
AO reopened assessment beyond 4 year period without establishing assessee failed to truly disclose material facts. ITAT quashed reopening, holding AO merely changed opinion without tangible belief of escaped income. PCIT's revision u/s 263 to assess other income was rejected as show-cause didn't specify impugned order date, making action time-barred. Further, PCIT couldn't conclude assessment erroneous for non-consideration of information already possessed by AO while forming reopening belief. Assessee's appeal allowed by ITAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
