Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's ...
Exemption for examination-related services rejected where recipients were commercial entities; suppression sustained extended limitation and penalties...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1281 to 1300 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed and set aside the show cause notices dated 20 October 2011 and 6 August 2012 issued to the Petitioner. The HC held that there was an unexplained delay of more than 10 years by the Respondents in adjudicating the show cause notices, and the Respondents failed to provide any justification for such inordinate delay. Consequently, following the decisions of the Coordinate Benches, the HC allowed the Petition and quashed the show cause notices due to the unreasonable delay in adjudication.
The HC quashed and set aside the show cause notices dated 20 October 2011 and 6 August 2012 issued to the Petitioner. The HC held that there was an unexplained delay of more than 10 years by the Respondents in adjudicating the show cause notices, and the Respondents failed to provide any justification for such inordinate delay. Consequently, following the decisions of the Coordinate Benches, the HC allowed the Petition and quashed the show cause notices due to the unreasonable delay in adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.