Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The HC quashed and set aside the show cause notices dated 20 October 2011 and 6 August 2012 issued to the Petitioner. The HC held that there was an unexplained delay of more than 10 years by the Respondents in adjudicating the show cause notices, and the Respondents failed to provide any justification for such inordinate delay. Consequently, following the decisions of the Coordinate Benches, the HC allowed the Petition and quashed the show cause notices due to the unreasonable delay in adjudication.
The HC quashed and set aside the show cause notices dated 20 October 2011 and 6 August 2012 issued to the Petitioner. The HC held that there was an unexplained delay of more than 10 years by the Respondents in adjudicating the show cause notices, and the Respondents failed to provide any justification for such inordinate delay. Consequently, following the decisions of the Coordinate Benches, the HC allowed the Petition and quashed the show cause notices due to the unreasonable delay in adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.