Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
HC upheld detention of goods and vehicle under Sec 129 of WBGST Act. Discrepancies between declared description and physical verification of goods, valuation gap indicated misrepresentation, intent to evade tax. Petitioner failed to substantiate legitimate trade practices or unreasonable valuation. HC found no procedural or legal infirmities in orders of adjudicating and appellate authorities. Regulatory measures under GST laws necessary, don't violate fundamental rights. Writ petition dismissed, detention order, tax demand, penalties under WBGST and CGST Acts affirmed.
HC upheld detention of goods and vehicle under Sec 129 of WBGST Act. Discrepancies between declared description and physical verification of goods, valuation gap indicated misrepresentation, intent to evade tax. Petitioner failed to substantiate legitimate trade practices or unreasonable valuation. HC found no procedural or legal infirmities in orders of adjudicating and appellate authorities. Regulatory measures under GST laws necessary, don't violate fundamental rights. Writ petition dismissed, detention order, tax demand, penalties under WBGST and CGST Acts affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
