Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the arrest of the petitioner on 30th November 2024 was illegal and the remand order dated 30th November 2024 was set aside. The petitioner was directed to be released from judicial custody forthwith, if not required in any other matter. The HC found discrepancies in the summons issued to the petitioner, raising doubts about the detention process. The remand order failed to address the issue of non-supply of written grounds of arrest, amounting to a mechanical order without application of mind. The HC emphasized that the pre-conditions for arrest act as stringent safeguards to protect the life and liberty of individuals.
The HC held that the arrest of the petitioner on 30th November 2024 was illegal and the remand order dated 30th November 2024 was set aside. The petitioner was directed to be released from judicial custody forthwith, if not required in any other matter. The HC found discrepancies in the summons issued to the petitioner, raising doubts about the detention process. The remand order failed to address the issue of non-supply of written grounds of arrest, amounting to a mechanical order without application of mind. The HC emphasized that the pre-conditions for arrest act as stringent safeguards to protect the life and liberty of individuals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
