Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal against the CIT(A)'s order deleting the addition made u/s 28(iv) for assets received free of cost from the assessee's associated enterprise (AE). The assets were used by the assessee for providing services to its AE on a cost-plus basis, with depreciation on these assets included in the cost base per the Advance Pricing Agreement. As the assessee received remuneration from its AE after mark-up on this cost base, the ITAT held that no benefit arose to the assessee from using these assets provided by the AE. The ITAT also dismissed the other grounds raised by the revenue regarding reimbursement to seconded employees and the low tax effect, upholding the CIT(A)'s order.
The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal against the CIT(A)'s order deleting the addition made u/s 28(iv) for assets received free of cost from the assessee's associated enterprise (AE). The assets were used by the assessee for providing services to its AE on a cost-plus basis, with depreciation on these assets included in the cost base per the Advance Pricing Agreement. As the assessee received remuneration from its AE after mark-up on this cost base, the ITAT held that no benefit arose to the assessee from using these assets provided by the AE. The ITAT also dismissed the other grounds raised by the revenue regarding reimbursement to seconded employees and the low tax effect, upholding the CIT(A)'s order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
