Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue Department against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of provision for overdue interest claimed by the assessee, finding no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order. The issue was identical to a previous case decided by the Nagpur Bench of the Tribunal. The Tribunal relied on Section 43D of the Income Tax Act, which permits income by way of interest in relation to bad and doubtful debts to be chargeable to tax as per RBI guidelines. Although Section 43D was made applicable to cooperative banks from the assessment year 2017-18, the Tribunal held that being a beneficial provision, it may be permitted to apply retrospectively. The Tribunal observed that Section 43D, being a non-obstante provision, overrides Section 145 of the Act.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue Department against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of provision for overdue interest claimed by the assessee, finding no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order. The issue was identical to a previous case decided by the Nagpur Bench of the Tribunal. The Tribunal relied on Section 43D of the Income Tax Act, which permits income by way of interest in relation to bad and doubtful debts to be chargeable to tax as per RBI guidelines. Although Section 43D was made applicable to cooperative banks from the assessment year 2017-18, the Tribunal held that being a beneficial provision, it may be permitted to apply retrospectively. The Tribunal observed that Section 43D, being a non-obstante provision, overrides Section 145 of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
