Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The High Court held that the order passed by NCLT approving the Resolution Plan u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is an appealable order u/s 61, with a limitation period of 30 days + 15 days to file an appeal before NCLAT. As the respondents failed to challenge the NCLT order within the prescribed time, they cannot take a stand contrary to the approved Resolution Plan. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed.
The High Court held that the order passed by NCLT approving the Resolution Plan u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is an appealable order u/s 61, with a limitation period of 30 days + 15 days to file an appeal before NCLAT. As the respondents failed to challenge the NCLT order within the prescribed time, they cannot take a stand contrary to the approved Resolution Plan. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
