Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT dismissed the application seeking to confine the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) to only the 'Spaze Arrow' project of the corporate debtor. The tribunal observed that claims had been filed by allottees of various projects, including 'Spaze Arrow' and 'Corporate Park'. Confining the CIRP to a single project would exclude claims from other projects. The tribunal noted that the CIRP against the corporate debtor for the 'Corporate Park' project had commenced after obtaining the occupancy and completion certificates, but the proceedings were later set aside due to a settlement. Considering the facts and circumstances, the NCLAT declined to pass an order limiting the CIRP to only the 'Spaze Arrow' project as requested by the applicant.
The NCLAT dismissed the application seeking to confine the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) to only the 'Spaze Arrow' project of the corporate debtor. The tribunal observed that claims had been filed by allottees of various projects, including 'Spaze Arrow' and 'Corporate Park'. Confining the CIRP to a single project would exclude claims from other projects. The tribunal noted that the CIRP against the corporate debtor for the 'Corporate Park' project had commenced after obtaining the occupancy and completion certificates, but the proceedings were later set aside due to a settlement. Considering the facts and circumstances, the NCLAT declined to pass an order limiting the CIRP to only the 'Spaze Arrow' project as requested by the applicant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
