Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The NCLAT dismissed the application seeking to confine the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) to only the 'Spaze Arrow' project of the corporate debtor. The tribunal observed that claims had been filed by allottees of various projects, including 'Spaze Arrow' and 'Corporate Park'. Confining the CIRP to a single project would exclude claims from other projects. The tribunal noted that the CIRP against the corporate debtor for the 'Corporate Park' project had commenced after obtaining the occupancy and completion certificates, but the proceedings were later set aside due to a settlement. Considering the facts and circumstances, the NCLAT declined to pass an order limiting the CIRP to only the 'Spaze Arrow' project as requested by the applicant.
The NCLAT dismissed the application seeking to confine the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) to only the 'Spaze Arrow' project of the corporate debtor. The tribunal observed that claims had been filed by allottees of various projects, including 'Spaze Arrow' and 'Corporate Park'. Confining the CIRP to a single project would exclude claims from other projects. The tribunal noted that the CIRP against the corporate debtor for the 'Corporate Park' project had commenced after obtaining the occupancy and completion certificates, but the proceedings were later set aside due to a settlement. Considering the facts and circumstances, the NCLAT declined to pass an order limiting the CIRP to only the 'Spaze Arrow' project as requested by the applicant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
