Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
The High Court allowed the petition and directed to hear the petitioner's appeal on merits without insisting on pre-deposit u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that the petitioner had a strong prima facie case regarding incentive payments received in connection with the use of the Computer Reservation System, as the legal position on such incentives earned by IATA members stood settled. Considering the rarity and exceptional circumstances, the court waived the condition of pre-deposit for the demands raised concerning incentive income, subject to the petitioner discharging the service tax liability quantified in the Order-in-Original.
The High Court allowed the petition and directed to hear the petitioner's appeal on merits without insisting on pre-deposit u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that the petitioner had a strong prima facie case regarding incentive payments received in connection with the use of the Computer Reservation System, as the legal position on such incentives earned by IATA members stood settled. Considering the rarity and exceptional circumstances, the court waived the condition of pre-deposit for the demands raised concerning incentive income, subject to the petitioner discharging the service tax liability quantified in the Order-in-Original.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
