Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review petitions filed by the parties. The Court held that no grounds were established for seeking a review of the order directing the refund of interest amount. The Court observed that the insufficient time to check calculations during the initial proceedings cannot be a ground for review. Regarding a letter from January 2014, which the Review Petitioner admitted was not brought to the Court's notice earlier, the Court stated that while it can be relied upon in the enquiry to fix responsibility for non-renewal of FD, it does not warrant a review of the Court's order. Consequently, both review petitions were dismissed by the High Court.
In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review petitions filed by the parties. The Court held that no grounds were established for seeking a review of the order directing the refund of interest amount. The Court observed that the insufficient time to check calculations during the initial proceedings cannot be a ground for review. Regarding a letter from January 2014, which the Review Petitioner admitted was not brought to the Court's notice earlier, the Court stated that while it can be relied upon in the enquiry to fix responsibility for non-renewal of FD, it does not warrant a review of the Court's order. Consequently, both review petitions were dismissed by the High Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
