Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
The High Court, while acknowledging the procedural deficiency of not issuing GST RFD-03 to the petitioner, held that the petitioner failed to avail the opportunity to raise such contentions in response to the show cause notice. However, considering the peculiar circumstances and the non-issuance of GST RFD-03, the Court set aside the impugned order dated 30 April 2024, subject to the petitioner paying costs of Rs. 2,00,000/- within 4 weeks, and restored the petitioner's refund application made in form GST RFD-01.
The High Court, while acknowledging the procedural deficiency of not issuing GST RFD-03 to the petitioner, held that the petitioner failed to avail the opportunity to raise such contentions in response to the show cause notice. However, considering the peculiar circumstances and the non-issuance of GST RFD-03, the Court set aside the impugned order dated 30 April 2024, subject to the petitioner paying costs of Rs. 2,00,000/- within 4 weeks, and restored the petitioner's refund application made in form GST RFD-01.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
