Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court, while acknowledging the procedural deficiency of not issuing GST RFD-03 to the petitioner, held that the petitioner failed to avail the opportunity to raise such contentions in response to the show cause notice. However, considering the peculiar circumstances and the non-issuance of GST RFD-03, the Court set aside the impugned order dated 30 April 2024, subject to the petitioner paying costs of Rs. 2,00,000/- within 4 weeks, and restored the petitioner's refund application made in form GST RFD-01.
The High Court, while acknowledging the procedural deficiency of not issuing GST RFD-03 to the petitioner, held that the petitioner failed to avail the opportunity to raise such contentions in response to the show cause notice. However, considering the peculiar circumstances and the non-issuance of GST RFD-03, the Court set aside the impugned order dated 30 April 2024, subject to the petitioner paying costs of Rs. 2,00,000/- within 4 weeks, and restored the petitioner's refund application made in form GST RFD-01.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
