Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court set aside the impugned orders u/s 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017/Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 regarding non-reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on account of Credit Notes issued by the Petitioner's suppliers. The Petitioner was directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks, subject to verification of any prior payments made. The impugned assessment order shall be treated as a show cause notice, and the Petitioner shall submit objections along with supporting documents within four weeks of receiving the order copy. The attachments, if any, would be lifted upon compliance with the deposit condition.
The High Court set aside the impugned orders u/s 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017/Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 regarding non-reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on account of Credit Notes issued by the Petitioner's suppliers. The Petitioner was directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks, subject to verification of any prior payments made. The impugned assessment order shall be treated as a show cause notice, and the Petitioner shall submit objections along with supporting documents within four weeks of receiving the order copy. The attachments, if any, would be lifted upon compliance with the deposit condition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
