Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The Hon'ble High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate tribunal after depositing 20 percent of the demanded tax amount as per the provisions of Section 112(8) of the GST Act, 2017 within 30 days. This was in line with the judgment passed by the Patna High Court in M/s Cohesive Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd., which held that subject to deposit of 20 percent of the remaining tax amount in dispute, the petitioner must be extended the statutory benefit of stay u/s 112(9) of the GST Act.
The Hon'ble High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate tribunal after depositing 20 percent of the demanded tax amount as per the provisions of Section 112(8) of the GST Act, 2017 within 30 days. This was in line with the judgment passed by the Patna High Court in M/s Cohesive Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd., which held that subject to deposit of 20 percent of the remaining tax amount in dispute, the petitioner must be extended the statutory benefit of stay u/s 112(9) of the GST Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
