Service permanent establishment requires non-auxiliary services, while arm's-length distributor remuneration precludes further profit attribution in I...
Make-available condition excludes standard SaaS subscription receipts where customers receive no independently usable technical knowledge after subscr...
Anonymous donation classification fails where charitable trusts maintain undisputed donor identity records and evidence corpus contributions' intended...
The petitioner was denied input tax credit as the alleged supplier did not provide any goods, violating principles of natural justice. The assessment order omitted outward and inward e-way bills from the accounts. The HC held that the existence of the supplier is a disputed question of fact that cannot be adjudicated under Article 226. The adequacy of evidence also cannot be examined under this provision. The HC rejected the challenge to the assessment order but permitted the petitioner to file an appeal within two weeks, subject to compliance with conditions like pre-deposit, and directed disposal of such appeal after reasonable opportunity of hearing.
The petitioner was denied input tax credit as the alleged supplier did not provide any goods, violating principles of natural justice. The assessment order omitted outward and inward e-way bills from the accounts. The HC held that the existence of the supplier is a disputed question of fact that cannot be adjudicated under Article 226. The adequacy of evidence also cannot be examined under this provision. The HC rejected the challenge to the assessment order but permitted the petitioner to file an appeal within two weeks, subject to compliance with conditions like pre-deposit, and directed disposal of such appeal after reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
