Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The High Court set aside the impugned orders of tax assessments for the period 2017-18 to 2022-23 against the petitioner and directed the Assessing Authority to redo the assessments after examining the applicability of Notification No.9 of 2017 dated 28.06.2017. The Court found merit in the petitioner's contention that if the petitioner is a unit of the Nuclear Fuel Complex/Department of Atomic Energy under the Central Government, the services rendered would be covered under the said notification, exempting them from Goods and Services Tax under Article 265 of the Constitution.
The High Court set aside the impugned orders of tax assessments for the period 2017-18 to 2022-23 against the petitioner and directed the Assessing Authority to redo the assessments after examining the applicability of Notification No.9 of 2017 dated 28.06.2017. The Court found merit in the petitioner's contention that if the petitioner is a unit of the Nuclear Fuel Complex/Department of Atomic Energy under the Central Government, the services rendered would be covered under the said notification, exempting them from Goods and Services Tax under Article 265 of the Constitution.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
