Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The High Court set aside the impugned orders of tax assessments for the period 2017-18 to 2022-23 against the petitioner and directed the Assessing Authority to redo the assessments after examining the applicability of Notification No.9 of 2017 dated 28.06.2017. The Court found merit in the petitioner's contention that if the petitioner is a unit of the Nuclear Fuel Complex/Department of Atomic Energy under the Central Government, the services rendered would be covered under the said notification, exempting them from Goods and Services Tax under Article 265 of the Constitution.
The High Court set aside the impugned orders of tax assessments for the period 2017-18 to 2022-23 against the petitioner and directed the Assessing Authority to redo the assessments after examining the applicability of Notification No.9 of 2017 dated 28.06.2017. The Court found merit in the petitioner's contention that if the petitioner is a unit of the Nuclear Fuel Complex/Department of Atomic Energy under the Central Government, the services rendered would be covered under the said notification, exempting them from Goods and Services Tax under Article 265 of the Constitution.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
