Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Supreme Court dismissed the petition challenging the cancellation of bail granted to the accused in a criminal conspiracy case involving cross-border narco-terrorism and a huge recovery of 500 kgs of heroin. The Court upheld the legality of the Central Government's orders transferring the investigation to the National Investigation Agency (NIA). It held that once the NIA is directed to investigate a Scheduled Offence against an accused, it can also investigate any other offence committed by the same accused, provided it is connected to the Scheduled Offence. The Court interpreted the term "the accused" in Section 8 of the NIA Act to include any other accused whose name emerges during the investigation and who has committed an offence connected to the Scheduled Offence. The NIA's investigation into non-scheduled offences under the NDPS Act against the petitioner was justified due to their connection with the Scheduled Offences being probed in the Gujarat case.
The Supreme Court dismissed the petition challenging the cancellation of bail granted to the accused in a criminal conspiracy case involving cross-border narco-terrorism and a huge recovery of 500 kgs of heroin. The Court upheld the legality of the Central Government's orders transferring the investigation to the National Investigation Agency (NIA). It held that once the NIA is directed to investigate a Scheduled Offence against an accused, it can also investigate any other offence committed by the same accused, provided it is connected to the Scheduled Offence. The Court interpreted the term "the accused" in Section 8 of the NIA Act to include any other accused whose name emerges during the investigation and who has committed an offence connected to the Scheduled Offence. The NIA's investigation into non-scheduled offences under the NDPS Act against the petitioner was justified due to their connection with the Scheduled Offences being probed in the Gujarat case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
