Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IA(4)(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the mere change of ownership of an existing undertaking through a slump sale would not disentitle the undertaking from the benefits u/s 80IA. The conditions prescribed u/s 80IA(3)(iii) regarding formation of an undertaking by splitting up or reconstruction of an existing business, or transfer of plant and machinery already used to a new business, were not applicable in this case. As the undertaking remained intact without any change in the plant and machinery or business, the mere change of ownership could not be a ground to deny the deduction u/s 80IA(4).
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IA(4)(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the mere change of ownership of an existing undertaking through a slump sale would not disentitle the undertaking from the benefits u/s 80IA. The conditions prescribed u/s 80IA(3)(iii) regarding formation of an undertaking by splitting up or reconstruction of an existing business, or transfer of plant and machinery already used to a new business, were not applicable in this case. As the undertaking remained intact without any change in the plant and machinery or business, the mere change of ownership could not be a ground to deny the deduction u/s 80IA(4).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.