Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IA(4)(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the mere change of ownership of an existing undertaking through a slump sale would not disentitle the undertaking from the benefits u/s 80IA. The conditions prescribed u/s 80IA(3)(iii) regarding formation of an undertaking by splitting up or reconstruction of an existing business, or transfer of plant and machinery already used to a new business, were not applicable in this case. As the undertaking remained intact without any change in the plant and machinery or business, the mere change of ownership could not be a ground to deny the deduction u/s 80IA(4).
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IA(4)(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the mere change of ownership of an existing undertaking through a slump sale would not disentitle the undertaking from the benefits u/s 80IA. The conditions prescribed u/s 80IA(3)(iii) regarding formation of an undertaking by splitting up or reconstruction of an existing business, or transfer of plant and machinery already used to a new business, were not applicable in this case. As the undertaking remained intact without any change in the plant and machinery or business, the mere change of ownership could not be a ground to deny the deduction u/s 80IA(4).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.