Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee, although not disclosing foreign investments in the prescribed Schedule FA of the income tax return, had disclosed the investments in another schedule and offered the perquisite value for taxation. Considering the bonafide disclosure, absence of malafide intention, and the legislative intent behind the Black Money Act to deal with undisclosed foreign income and assets, the Tribunal deleted the penalty imposed u/s 43 of the Act for non-reporting of foreign assets. The decision was in favor of the assessee.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee, although not disclosing foreign investments in the prescribed Schedule FA of the income tax return, had disclosed the investments in another schedule and offered the perquisite value for taxation. Considering the bonafide disclosure, absence of malafide intention, and the legislative intent behind the Black Money Act to deal with undisclosed foreign income and assets, the Tribunal deleted the penalty imposed u/s 43 of the Act for non-reporting of foreign assets. The decision was in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.