Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Supreme Court quashed the High Court's order upholding the Special Judge's adverse observations against the appellant police officer for an offense u/s 58 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The Court held that the Special Judge violated principles of natural justice by making findings without giving proper notice or following summary trial procedure prescribed u/s 36-A(5) of the NDPS Act read with the Cr.P.C. The Court reiterated that good faith actions under the NDPS Act are granted statutory immunity unless cogent material shows unreasonable motive, and mere allegations cannot dislodge presumption of good faith discharge of duties. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned orders.
The Supreme Court quashed the High Court's order upholding the Special Judge's adverse observations against the appellant police officer for an offense u/s 58 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The Court held that the Special Judge violated principles of natural justice by making findings without giving proper notice or following summary trial procedure prescribed u/s 36-A(5) of the NDPS Act read with the Cr.P.C. The Court reiterated that good faith actions under the NDPS Act are granted statutory immunity unless cogent material shows unreasonable motive, and mere allegations cannot dislodge presumption of good faith discharge of duties. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
