Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal upheld the order that the interstate transfer of goods by the appellant from its factory in Coimbatore to its depot in Palakkad, Kerala, during the period from 01.04.1996 to 28.08.1996, constituted inter-state sales, attracting central sales tax. The finding was based on the correspondence and invoices indicating that sales occasioned the inter-state movement of goods under the disputed Forms F during that period. For the remaining assessment year, the order of assessment was set aside. The appellant's alternative prayer for an order u/s 22(1B) of the CST Act, directing Kerala to transfer the refundable amount paid as sales tax to Tamil Nadu, could not be granted due to lack of details regarding the sales tax claimed to have been paid in Kerala. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The Appellate Tribunal upheld the order that the interstate transfer of goods by the appellant from its factory in Coimbatore to its depot in Palakkad, Kerala, during the period from 01.04.1996 to 28.08.1996, constituted inter-state sales, attracting central sales tax. The finding was based on the correspondence and invoices indicating that sales occasioned the inter-state movement of goods under the disputed Forms F during that period. For the remaining assessment year, the order of assessment was set aside. The appellant's alternative prayer for an order u/s 22(1B) of the CST Act, directing Kerala to transfer the refundable amount paid as sales tax to Tamil Nadu, could not be granted due to lack of details regarding the sales tax claimed to have been paid in Kerala. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
