Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court confirmed the conviction of the revisionist u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that the presumptions u/ss 118 and 139 are rebuttable, and the accused is not required to rebut them beyond reasonable doubt but only by a preponderance of probabilities. The revisionist's defense that the cheque was given as security by his employee for a loan was not accepted due to contradictory statements about the interest rate. The court sentenced the revisionist to the period of custody already undergone and upheld the fine and compensation order.
The High Court confirmed the conviction of the revisionist u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that the presumptions u/ss 118 and 139 are rebuttable, and the accused is not required to rebut them beyond reasonable doubt but only by a preponderance of probabilities. The revisionist's defense that the cheque was given as security by his employee for a loan was not accepted due to contradictory statements about the interest rate. The court sentenced the revisionist to the period of custody already undergone and upheld the fine and compensation order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
