Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court allowed the petition challenging the demand raised by the respondent Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority from the petitioner towards GST and premium. The demand was set aside as it was a non-speaking order, violating the principles of natural justice and being contrary to notifications, advance ruling, and the Court's judgment. The respondent was permitted to raise a fresh demand by passing a detailed speaking order considering relevant notifications, advance ruling, the Court's judgment, and subsequent notifications before 05.12.2023, indicating the petitioner's liability to pay the GST amount.
The High Court allowed the petition challenging the demand raised by the respondent Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority from the petitioner towards GST and premium. The demand was set aside as it was a non-speaking order, violating the principles of natural justice and being contrary to notifications, advance ruling, and the Court's judgment. The respondent was permitted to raise a fresh demand by passing a detailed speaking order considering relevant notifications, advance ruling, the Court's judgment, and subsequent notifications before 05.12.2023, indicating the petitioner's liability to pay the GST amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
