Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The High Court allowed the petition challenging the demand raised by the respondent Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority from the petitioner towards GST and premium. The demand was set aside as it was a non-speaking order, violating the principles of natural justice and being contrary to notifications, advance ruling, and the Court's judgment. The respondent was permitted to raise a fresh demand by passing a detailed speaking order considering relevant notifications, advance ruling, the Court's judgment, and subsequent notifications before 05.12.2023, indicating the petitioner's liability to pay the GST amount.
The High Court allowed the petition challenging the demand raised by the respondent Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority from the petitioner towards GST and premium. The demand was set aside as it was a non-speaking order, violating the principles of natural justice and being contrary to notifications, advance ruling, and the Court's judgment. The respondent was permitted to raise a fresh demand by passing a detailed speaking order considering relevant notifications, advance ruling, the Court's judgment, and subsequent notifications before 05.12.2023, indicating the petitioner's liability to pay the GST amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
