Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1121 to 1140 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessing officer (AO) is empowered u/s 275(1A) to revise the penalty order by giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee within six months from the receipt of an appellate or revision order modifying the assessment. In the event the order passed by the Tribunal is modified by the High Court, the AO is required to give effect to the High Court's judgment by invoking Section 275(1A) and revise the penalty order accordingly. The CIT(A) correctly followed the Coordinate Bench decision and deleted the proportionate penalty levied by the AO to the extent of additions not confirmed by the Appellate Tribunal. The Revenue failed to demonstrate any stay order issued by the High Court against the Tribunal's order. Hence, the CIT(A)'s order confirming the penalty to the extent of additions confirmed by the Appellate Tribunal is upheld, and the Revenue's ground is dismissed.
The assessing officer (AO) is empowered u/s 275(1A) to revise the penalty order by giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee within six months from the receipt of an appellate or revision order modifying the assessment. In the event the order passed by the Tribunal is modified by the High Court, the AO is required to give effect to the High Court's judgment by invoking Section 275(1A) and revise the penalty order accordingly. The CIT(A) correctly followed the Coordinate Bench decision and deleted the proportionate penalty levied by the AO to the extent of additions not confirmed by the Appellate Tribunal. The Revenue failed to demonstrate any stay order issued by the High Court against the Tribunal's order. Hence, the CIT(A)'s order confirming the penalty to the extent of additions confirmed by the Appellate Tribunal is upheld, and the Revenue's ground is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
