Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1501 to 1520 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessee claimed the entire cash amount recovered from two lockers as business income, not subject to tax u/s 115BBE. The Tribunal held that since the cash from one locker was recorded in books and the source of income from the other locker was not disputed, both amounts should be treated as business income under normal provisions, not taxed u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE dealing with unexplained cash credits. The application of Section 115BBE was found to be not legal in this case.
The assessee claimed the entire cash amount recovered from two lockers as business income, not subject to tax u/s 115BBE. The Tribunal held that since the cash from one locker was recorded in books and the source of income from the other locker was not disputed, both amounts should be treated as business income under normal provisions, not taxed u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE dealing with unexplained cash credits. The application of Section 115BBE was found to be not legal in this case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.