Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that while computing book profit u/s 115JB, adjustments u/s 14A read with Rule 8D are impermissible. However, expenditure directly incurred towards generating exempt income can be added to book profit under Explanation 1(f) to Section 115JB(2), without resorting to the amount calculated u/s 14A read with Rule 8D. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to verify such expenditure. Regarding additions u/s 153A, if the year is an unabated assessment year without incriminating material, no addition can be made. However, completed assessments can be reopened u/ss 147/148, subject to conditions, following the Supreme Court's decision in Abhisar Buildwell.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that while computing book profit u/s 115JB, adjustments u/s 14A read with Rule 8D are impermissible. However, expenditure directly incurred towards generating exempt income can be added to book profit under Explanation 1(f) to Section 115JB(2), without resorting to the amount calculated u/s 14A read with Rule 8D. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to verify such expenditure. Regarding additions u/s 153A, if the year is an unabated assessment year without incriminating material, no addition can be made. However, completed assessments can be reopened u/ss 147/148, subject to conditions, following the Supreme Court's decision in Abhisar Buildwell.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.