Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal held that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)/Assessing Officer (AO) should exclude companies having turnover exceeding Rs. 200 crores from the comparability analysis while calculating the arm's length price (ALP) of the assessee's international transactions with its associated enterprise, after necessary verification. The companies ICRA Techno Analytics Ltd and Kals Information Systems Ltd. were found functionally different from the assessee engaged in software development services and hence cannot be included as comparables. However, Quintegra Solution Limited, being functionally similar and having similar turnover, cannot be excluded merely for showing losses due to extraordinary deductions. The AO/TPO was directed to include it as a comparable. Regarding working capital adjustment, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the AO/TPO for fresh adjudication as per law, allowing the assessee to furnish necessary details. The royalty expenses were held as revenue in nature based on earlier years' decisions. The AO was directed to correctly compute interest u/ss 234D and 244A as per provisions of law.
The Tribunal held that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)/Assessing Officer (AO) should exclude companies having turnover exceeding Rs. 200 crores from the comparability analysis while calculating the arm's length price (ALP) of the assessee's international transactions with its associated enterprise, after necessary verification. The companies ICRA Techno Analytics Ltd and Kals Information Systems Ltd. were found functionally different from the assessee engaged in software development services and hence cannot be included as comparables. However, Quintegra Solution Limited, being functionally similar and having similar turnover, cannot be excluded merely for showing losses due to extraordinary deductions. The AO/TPO was directed to include it as a comparable. Regarding working capital adjustment, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the AO/TPO for fresh adjudication as per law, allowing the assessee to furnish necessary details. The royalty expenses were held as revenue in nature based on earlier years' decisions. The AO was directed to correctly compute interest u/ss 234D and 244A as per provisions of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
