Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The High Court set aside the final assessment order and demand notice issued by the Income Tax department. The petitioner had filed an application u/s 35-A of the Income Tax Act manually, but failed to e-file the acknowledged copy of the application in Form No. 35-A despite repeated attempts between 29.12.2023 and 31.12.2023 due to technical glitches and bona fide reasons. The Court remitted the matter back to the Income Tax department for fresh reconsideration, accepting the petitioner's assertion that the failure to e-file was due to unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause.
The High Court set aside the final assessment order and demand notice issued by the Income Tax department. The petitioner had filed an application u/s 35-A of the Income Tax Act manually, but failed to e-file the acknowledged copy of the application in Form No. 35-A despite repeated attempts between 29.12.2023 and 31.12.2023 due to technical glitches and bona fide reasons. The Court remitted the matter back to the Income Tax department for fresh reconsideration, accepting the petitioner's assertion that the failure to e-file was due to unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
