Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
The High Court set aside the final assessment order and demand notice issued by the Income Tax department. The petitioner had filed an application u/s 35-A of the Income Tax Act manually, but failed to e-file the acknowledged copy of the application in Form No. 35-A despite repeated attempts between 29.12.2023 and 31.12.2023 due to technical glitches and bona fide reasons. The Court remitted the matter back to the Income Tax department for fresh reconsideration, accepting the petitioner's assertion that the failure to e-file was due to unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause.
The High Court set aside the final assessment order and demand notice issued by the Income Tax department. The petitioner had filed an application u/s 35-A of the Income Tax Act manually, but failed to e-file the acknowledged copy of the application in Form No. 35-A despite repeated attempts between 29.12.2023 and 31.12.2023 due to technical glitches and bona fide reasons. The Court remitted the matter back to the Income Tax department for fresh reconsideration, accepting the petitioner's assertion that the failure to e-file was due to unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.