Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and deleted the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 154 read with Section 143(3) and by the CIT(A). The AO erred in passing the order u/s 154 by making the disallowance of amortization of telecom license u/s 35ABB and depreciation on right to use telecom spectrum u/s 32. The CIT(A) also erred by disallowing an amount which was not part of the appeal before them. The ITAT held that the CIT(A) exercised jurisdiction beyond the scope of the appeal by disallowing an amount which was part of separate appeal proceedings. Accordingly, the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and additional grounds, deleting the disallowances made by the AO and CIT(A).
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and deleted the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 154 read with Section 143(3) and by the CIT(A). The AO erred in passing the order u/s 154 by making the disallowance of amortization of telecom license u/s 35ABB and depreciation on right to use telecom spectrum u/s 32. The CIT(A) also erred by disallowing an amount which was not part of the appeal before them. The ITAT held that the CIT(A) exercised jurisdiction beyond the scope of the appeal by disallowing an amount which was part of separate appeal proceedings. Accordingly, the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and additional grounds, deleting the disallowances made by the AO and CIT(A).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
