Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The Appellate Tribunal held that the definition of 'proceeds of crime' encompasses not only the property derived or obtained directly or indirectly from criminal activity, but also any other property of equivalent value when the original proceeds are unavailable. The Adjudicating Authority's narrow interpretation of the definition was incorrect. The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order and remanded the case for fresh consideration within the statutory period, with parties to remain present on 10.12.2024. The appeal was allowed.
The Appellate Tribunal held that the definition of 'proceeds of crime' encompasses not only the property derived or obtained directly or indirectly from criminal activity, but also any other property of equivalent value when the original proceeds are unavailable. The Adjudicating Authority's narrow interpretation of the definition was incorrect. The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order and remanded the case for fresh consideration within the statutory period, with parties to remain present on 10.12.2024. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.