Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The Appellate Tribunal held that the definition of 'proceeds of crime' encompasses not only the property derived or obtained directly or indirectly from criminal activity, but also any other property of equivalent value when the original proceeds are unavailable. The Adjudicating Authority's narrow interpretation of the definition was incorrect. The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order and remanded the case for fresh consideration within the statutory period, with parties to remain present on 10.12.2024. The appeal was allowed.
The Appellate Tribunal held that the definition of 'proceeds of crime' encompasses not only the property derived or obtained directly or indirectly from criminal activity, but also any other property of equivalent value when the original proceeds are unavailable. The Adjudicating Authority's narrow interpretation of the definition was incorrect. The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order and remanded the case for fresh consideration within the statutory period, with parties to remain present on 10.12.2024. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.